Portrait Of A Seeker Of Essence

Blog for the novel, "Portrait Of A Seeker Of Essence," which is about a few years in the life of a musician and his personal and spiritual changes. The novel can be read at www.portraitofaseekerofessence.name. Please feel free to post comments on a chapter by chapter basis, before you've finished reading the entire novel. Please use reasonable language. Thanks - Russell Kolish, Author - Click on the lowest thread title on the left and ten additional titles will come up.

Monday

T23 - Illusions - C 6 and 7

I've re-read the book many times and had many interesting thoughts while reading. Regarding memories and the themes in the story (if I recall correctly, ideas about memories came up in chapters 6 and 7) I think that one idea of what or who we think we are is that our individuality, personality and identity is composed of memories. You can verify this for yourself with some in‑depth thinking. Memories are notoriously inaccurate, incomplete and even non‑existent for experiences we know we've had. Our memories are illusions. Who we are is illusion(s). If this is all we are then we don't really exist. If we are also spirit or soul as many people like to believe, we know of these other elements of our beings only through our memories of what we've been told or, if we're a practiced spiritual person, through our intuitive sensations. At the very moment we experience the intuitive sensation we can know something (to be true) however a fraction of a second later it becomes a memory. If we continue living in the intuitive sensation, called 'being in the moment,' we can have direct experience of reality. This experience is without ego of course because it takes time, even if only thousandths of a second, for ego, which is reflective, observational and judgmental, to operate. When we are in this intuitive sensation we as individuals, personalities, identities (egos), don't exist because we are without ego, absorptive, non‑reflective. So, any way we look at it we don't really exist at all. What we consider to be 'us,' our individuality, our personality, our identity, is illusions. The old philosophical adage 'I think therefore I am' is completely wrong. So, if we don't really exist why do we take ourselves so seriously? As though we are important. Why do we consider our thoughts and feelings important or meaningful? Because we love our illusions. They make us feel real, at least in the sense that we identify with our cultures and what we've been told is true all our lives. We also understand unconsciously or intuitively that beyond them is nothing, no‑thing, and this puzzles us or makes us (egos) fearful. This creates anxiety, the causes of which we find very difficult to confront. This existential angst, floating anxiety, fear of death, whether physical or spiritual, however, gets our attention and we focus on it seriously as though we can influence the outcome(s). We're trying to relieve ourselves of that (no‑thingness or ego-less awareness) which itself is relief from our concerns, fears, etc. We are then immersed in Maya, our world of the continuous cyclings of concerns and illusions. By repeated involvement over time, habit, we are addicted and blinded to any possibility of resolution or escape from this cycling. As you are reading this you are having the sensation of cycling. This is your life.

This is what I call 'The Illusion Of Personality.'

Everything has many layers. How do we get to the bottom line (foundation, base, ground)? According to Gableplunk meditation is the path to follow for release. I think that's true at least in our lifetimes.

***

What if there's another possibility for memory, that of memory being located outside of us, outside of our bodies, our nervous systems? This is a theory of occultists of various disciplines which claim that we 'receive' our memories from this outside place in a similar manner as does a radio or television, by radio waves, and in the case of our memories, by psychic waves. I don't know how accurately I've described the method of this kind of receipt of our memories but the idea of our memories being located somewhere other than inside of us, in our brains or nervous systems, seems like it might be worth an examination.

***

How do we make personal changes in light of the 'Illusion Of Personality?'

Observing ourselves we notice through self awareness that our identities must be capable of monitoring our feelings and behaviors and directing us to (hopefully) better behaviors and feelings which create better memories which create (hopefully) better feelings and behaviors.

So, through our identities, which are illusions, we create more mnemonic illusions but (hopefully) better ones, more mature ones based on monitored and directed experiences. Thus, as we observe ourselves through self awareness, we seem to change.

Illusions can be self-generating, reproductive, replicative, self-perpetuating. Are our illusions real? As real as, say, birds or germs? How do they get into us? Are identities necessary for illusions to procreate? Are we inseparable?

Ultimately illusions are the products of nervous systems. Without nerves we could not feel anything. Feelings are the body's reactions to memories. Without nerves we could not have memories or perceive them if we receive them from outside us. So, illusions are bound to our physical bodies, our biologies, as are our minds, our psychologies. Our minds are memories. Our memories are illusions, so, yes, we are inseparable.

If 'I think therefore I am' is incorrect then what might be correct is 'I SENSE therefore I am.' In this case, what is it that senses? Our nervous system. Are we merely our nervous system? The answer is, yes.


This thinking goes
round and round. Maya, the cycle of illusions. When your mind is cycling you're experiencing an illusion. Meditation is release, at least temporarily: our best change.

***

I try to make this analysis concrete but it's impossible because of the nature of language which is metaphoric and vague. Mathematics would be a better tool for this. Physicists and Mathematicians do analyze illusions, however, they present their findings/thoughts in a language that only one out of a hundred thousand of us can read.

***

Illusions, delusions, schmillusions. It's not illusions that screw up your life. It's expectations. Keep your expectations in perspective and life flows smoothly. Knock them a little out of kilter and life can turn hellish.

13 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Danny from Albuquerque

If fragmented memories lead to illusions what is it in us that is an organizing,
continuity creating power that causes us to have the ‘illusion’ that we have smoothly continuous identities, soul?

10:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Randy from Virginia Beach

Has anyone considered the idea that revealing illusions is illusory? We can’t really think or speak about them much without living an illusion while we are considering them. If we can’t reasonably consider them how can we uncover them, then? Is it useful to uncover our illusions or is it silly?

Re: 'soul,' some neuro scientists think it's a brain function. See back issues of "Scientific American" magazine for articles and references.

3:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ralph - Toledo
Practicing Democracy is an illusion of involvement in our society.

4:35 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Aruge’, Miami

There are more political illusions than you can count on the fingers of a thousand
people.

5:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bertrand from Paris
Another illusion we all have is being in control. We all say, ‘I have control over my
own life. I make decisions. I direct myself.’ Sometimes we succeed. We’re in the
right place at the right time and we make good decisions and we get what we
want. Then something whisks through our life and everything is in shambles. We
ask, ‘What happened?’ All our control flew out the window. Then it seems as if
we had no control at all. Our control was an illusion.

So in what ways do you adjust your expectations as you run into these shocks time
after time?

5:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Russ here

Just like everything is metaphor, EVERYTHING is fiction.
I see no constancy of identity, only illusions, fictions and delusions. However, woven
through everything is ONE constancy, that of the ever-present illusions, fictions and
delusions themselves.
What might we call this?
Human nature?
The spirit of illusion? Maya?
Yes. However, it is most accurately called the essence of mankind.

Of course it is ever-present through all our endeavors and is especially noticeable in
the political arena where it rushes out at us like a character in a 3D movie. It’s also
present in art which, of course, uses it for effect and as commentary. In Psychology
it’s extraordinary that Psychologists can work with people at all let alone guide them
through difficult times, events and adjustments. The application of the quasi
science’s concepts can be the actual structure to which both the Psychologist and
Patient (or Client) adhere, bringing at least the illusion of continuity and its calming
effects to people who may be temporarily fragmented, anxiety stricken or
floundering. Philosophers concoct huge intellectual edifices, as huge as their egos,
and ignore the cracks in their conceptual foundations and business people, politicians
and educators hitch a ride on the new social engine.

If one takes it all too seriously, which I tend to do, life can become depressing so it’s
wise to step back a little mentally, maybe have a laugh or two over life’s absurdities
but of course how can one do this without isolating oneself or insulating oneself from
everyone else?

There IS a trick to it of course - spiritual training (not religious training). This can
help with perspective and balance.

And then..... there are always the people who are utterly CONVINCED that
whatever they’re doing is best for everyone else. These people of course RUN the
engine.

You have to admire the ingenuity of mankind even though it leads to so much
destructive behavior which leads to sadness which leads to aloneness and eventually
confusion which leads to the need to find enlightenment which leads to starting the
cycle all over again. The essence of mankind. “Have a drink from my flask,” said the
friendly gesture - Gableplunk.

Catch a glimpse of fleeting winds
And hands trying to grasp them
But winds are insubstantial things
And hands pass right through them
Sleep my friend your time has come
Said the ghost to the Mandarin
Tomorrow you'll open your eyes again
And begin the new beginnin'

2:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Albert from San Diego

Better to not have been born? What makes anyone think they’ve been born? Maybe we don’t really exist. Maybe we’re just recording devices and a bad ones at that. We can’t even accurately repeat back what we’ve recorded.

How do we expect to make any sense of life?

I think, therefore I am. There’s only one thing wrong with that: thinking that we exist is what causes all our troubles.

So, one of western cultures’ basic premises leads immediately to an ongoing morass of intellectual and emotional irreconcilabilities.

1:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ted from Buffalo

Regarding continuity: maybe it’s just perceptions. One person’s perception of their life might be satisfyingly continuous and the next person or even their twin, three feet away, may perceive the same world as fragmented, the difference being caused by their different psychological, emotional or spiritual states, even brain chemicals. So, whose perception is correct? Both.

12:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Marti from Richmond

Our self is a FUNCTION of our nervous system which imbues us with awareness of our body and memories.

As we age we have more memories. This increasing number of memories enables us to refine our sense of who we are.

So, self is awareness of our bodies and increasing memories.

An increasing number of memories along with awareness gives us our sense of self which IS our self. Our sense of self IS our self. Our self is a SENSE.

Oddly, it’s a sense of things which do not exist in a unified fashion. So our selves are in fact unifiers or unifying FUNCTIONS of our nervous systems. Thus our selves present to us an illusion of our selves through which we view and interpret the world.

I say ‘our selves present to us....’ Is there any difference between ‘us’ and our ‘selves’? To what element(s) in us is our ‘self’ presenting? Is our ‘self’ ‘us’? Are we self-presenting creatures? If so, do we ever see ANYTHING other than what we want to see? We’ve all heard a variation of the phrase, ‘He/she was confronted with (such and such), something he/she didn’t want to see and he/she went to pieces.’ I suppose that’s mostly an exaggeration but we’ve all been terrified of things like truth or things we really didn’t want to know. So, is our ‘self’ a little game we play, a game of mirrors and hiding? Seekers want to know these things and when they find out the answers to their questions they laugh. They say, “So that’s it,” and shake their heads at the irony of it all.

3:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

William from upstate NY

A definition of society could be: controlled illusions. Who’s doing the controlling? All of us. We all contribute our own illusions to the social fabric. Of course we picked them up to begin with FROM the social fabric - and this is how a culture is perpetuated.

Where is the element of control? Choices. Every choice we make, and some say that in this kind of merry-go-‘round we have no choices at all, every choice transports the society a tiny distance into the future, again, perpetuating the common agreement of what our society is. Of course there are changes, too, but change is very slow: control: maintenance of what the majority feel is good or useful and change through adding newness which slowly displaces/replaces that which it has improved upon, again, in a slow, controlled fashion, mostly, at least, in stable societies. I suppose unstable societies exhibit uncontrolled illusions, people wreaking havoc through their beliefs. If I were born in a different part of the world I’d hope that I’d be intelligent enough to understand that the beliefs I held from that culture were just as silly as the ones I hold now.

So beliefs are illusions and societies are conglomerations of illusions so what’s real? Nothing.

This is how we spend our lives: filling our minds with even more illusions which we use to deny that fact. So what’s real? Nothing. Accept it. Get over the shock. Keep on doing whatever you’re doing and fuh ged aboud it.

Is this nihilism? A viewpoint that traditional values and beliefs are unfounded and that existence is senseless and useless? No. Nihilism is a belief or a philosophy. This is merely observation of illusions. One might say that one can’t make an
observation without a viewpoint. Okay. Then my feeling that nothing is real, in my mind does NOT imply that existence is senseless OR useless. We can make whatever sense of life we wish. This is necessary at the very least to avoid depression let alone nihilism. The same with usefulness. This is a good reason to HAVE illusions.

***

What ARE some social or cultural illusions? Democracy, the Divine Right of Kings (European, earlier centuries), Colonialism, neo-colonialism, business advertising, Papal Infallibility, the illusion of knowledge (which the Church tries to use to its advantage by recommending ignorance as a way of life - maybe they’re right), the West’s illusions about individuality, the illusion of control on all sorts of levels, the illusion of individual peace and tranquility through activities such as meditation or maintaining a Zen garden.

What ISN”T an illusion? The word ‘illusion’ becomes meaningless if we apply it to everything. Maybe the better question is ‘how can we DIFFERENTIATE between illusions? What illusions are good for us and which ones bad?’ I suppose that’s a
matter of personal choice (is choice an illusion, too?) or social conscience (awareness of how our society is constructed and the willingness to make choices about what is best for it).

12:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


“Imagination and fiction make up more than three quarters of our real life.”
- Simone Weil, 1909-1943 -

1:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nick from Lumembourg

One thing Western Psychologists fail to comprehend is that peoples’ minds are almost entirely illusions (as are psychological concepts, ingenious names for imaginary concepts). Freud was a great novelist (his themes were about the mind) and proof that Psychology is mostly art not science - which is not to say that it isn’t useful.

Psychologists take the mind too seriously in the pursuit of their art. In the sense that they build all sorts of artificial constructs, concepts, about the ‘mind’ they are like the Church which does the same about that which they take very seriously: God.

As little as two hundred years ago Psychologists, if they were to exist then, would have been burned as heretics by their brothers in mass mental manipulation, the Church.

1:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Stephanie from Savannah

Most people have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA of how deluded they are.

And so, the opening up of the mind of the average person to this idea is like a can of worms: repugnant.

And so, even if they experience a hint of this, they shut it down and live in denial.

And so, this forms the character of Western Man and dooms people to life long conflict between what they think they understand and what really is true. Metaphoric blindness.

Delusion can take the form of an absent God upon whom we may project our fondest wishes because we, ourselves, refuse to come to grips with our denials, refuse to accept our prime responsibility: to SEE.

2:27 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home